<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GMail is sometimes being blocked by spamcop.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://switch.richard5.net/2006/03/22/gmail-is-sometimes-being-blocked-by-spamcopnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://switch.richard5.net/2006/03/22/gmail-is-sometimes-being-blocked-by-spamcopnet/</link>
	<description>How to build your Mac into a internet server using open source software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:25:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://switch.richard5.net/2006/03/22/gmail-is-sometimes-being-blocked-by-spamcopnet/comment-page-1/#comment-14852</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 07:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switch.richard5.net/2006/03/22/gmail-is-sometimes-being-blocked-by-spamcopnet/#comment-14852</guid>
		<description>Dave its administrators like you that over filter users email, if you filter all but five spam messages thats ok - if you block so much as one desired email, your users will be pissed and use a free service like Gmail Yahoo or MSN.

&quot;I don’t know if you realize this but this “protecting privacy” is something that simply does not exist within the SMTP protocol. So in essense, Google is claiming to provide a level of “privacy” that the rest of the world is never ensured or granted.&quot;

Sure SMTP is insecure but have you ever tried not to be path of least resistance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave its administrators like you that over filter users email, if you filter all but five spam messages thats ok &#8211; if you block so much as one desired email, your users will be pissed and use a free service like Gmail Yahoo or MSN.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t know if you realize this but this “protecting privacy” is something that simply does not exist within the SMTP protocol. So in essense, Google is claiming to provide a level of “privacy” that the rest of the world is never ensured or granted.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure SMTP is insecure but have you ever tried not to be path of least resistance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -=dave</title>
		<link>http://switch.richard5.net/2006/03/22/gmail-is-sometimes-being-blocked-by-spamcopnet/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>-=dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switch.richard5.net/2006/03/22/gmail-is-sometimes-being-blocked-by-spamcopnet/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>As an ISP who&#039;s clients rely on to keep their inboxes as free from spam as possible, I was surprised to hear about Google&#039;s stance on why they do not provide the IP address of the originating sender.

I don&#039;t know if you realize this but this &quot;protecting privacy&quot; is something that simply does not exist within the SMTP protocol.  So in essense, Google is claiming to provide a level of &quot;privacy&quot; that the rest of the world is never ensured or granted.

 If find Google&#039;s stance on this issue simply flawed and will notify my users accordingly and let them decide.

And regarding the use of other lists, including the sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org list, they too have the capability of suffering from the same technical issue as the RBL from spamcop so just because the Spamcop project was mentioned specifically, doesn&#039;t mean that jumping ship and shaking a finger at spamcop is the informed thing to do.    Just thought you&#039;d like to know :)

-=dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an ISP who&#8217;s clients rely on to keep their inboxes as free from spam as possible, I was surprised to hear about Google&#8217;s stance on why they do not provide the IP address of the originating sender.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you realize this but this &#8220;protecting privacy&#8221; is something that simply does not exist within the SMTP protocol.  So in essense, Google is claiming to provide a level of &#8220;privacy&#8221; that the rest of the world is never ensured or granted.</p>
<p> If find Google&#8217;s stance on this issue simply flawed and will notify my users accordingly and let them decide.</p>
<p>And regarding the use of other lists, including the sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org list, they too have the capability of suffering from the same technical issue as the RBL from spamcop so just because the Spamcop project was mentioned specifically, doesn&#8217;t mean that jumping ship and shaking a finger at spamcop is the informed thing to do.    Just thought you&#8217;d like to know <img src='http://switch.richard5.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-=dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://switch.richard5.net/2006/03/22/gmail-is-sometimes-being-blocked-by-spamcopnet/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switch.richard5.net/2006/03/22/gmail-is-sometimes-being-blocked-by-spamcopnet/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Same here, I stopped using spamcop because of that issue

I only use these two RBL, which is quite enough for my domain :
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here, I stopped using spamcop because of that issue</p>
<p>I only use these two RBL, which is quite enough for my domain :<br />
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org<br />
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

